Bedtime Stories Should be Banned?

When I was growing up, one of my fondest memories was the chapter of a book my mother would read to us each night after we said our prayers. We raised our children the same way with prayers and then everyone gathered around the bed, favorite book in hand, waiting for their turn to have Dad read it to them. Dad got the job because he did the voices much better than I did, besides, I usually had a baby in arms to tend to but we were still there for the reading time. Imagine my surprise to see these ‘studies’ released on the subject:

The first link pertains to it being unfair that some children were read to by their parents and other children were less fortunate so, instead of encouraging ALL parents to read bedtime stories, it is discussed whether it would be more ‘fair’ to discourage the parents who read bedtime stories. It seems children who were read to did better in their choices, academics, and life than others who did not have this ‘unfair’ advantage.

The second link seems very worried about the impact of family in the social structure and muse over the premise that the social structure would be more ‘fair’ if there was not a family unit that takes a side swipe at the ‘impaired’ family units. Seems like both are a case of ‘don’t amend what needs fixing but take away the working group in order to make it more ‘fair’ to the ones that aren’t working.

The word ‘fair’ is used a lot in our liberal culture of today and appears in most every country. When I was growing up and someone wasn’t chosen for a team or got a bad grade, you were sure to hear the one that didn’t work for the goal of being on a team or studied for a good grade complain, “It’s not fair!” The cure in our culture that seems to be circling the drain is to ‘make’ it all fair even if it isn’t fair to the group that is doing well with their family life and horrors or horrors, reading to their children!

This sort of thinking is a long time in coming and has been simmering for a long time. About twenty years ago, I was at the grocery store and chatting with the cashier who I had gotten to know over my years of shopping there. She mentioned that her five year old was reading at a second grade level because she read to her at bedtime and they played games learning words . . . but would have to stop. Naturally, I asked WHY? She said the teacher informed her that having a child in Kindergarten that was so advanced of the rest of the class was disruptive and if she continued teaching her child at home and usurping the teacher’s ‘authority’, the teacher felt she had no choice but to turn her into Child Services for child abuse. The cashier later studied to get her teaching degree and I imagine it was to try and provide a sane corner of the world in the school system.

Iraqi Nun Barred from describing Christian Persecution in the United States

Not surprising but still very unfair, sad, and unchristian. Read it and pass it on.


Obama blocks Iraqi nun from describing Christian persecution
A leading conservative is asking why the Obama State Department is barring a persecuted Iraqi nun from entry into the United States to share her message about the brutal treatment of Christians in her country.
Nina Shea of the Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom, writes in a National Review op-ed that Sister Diana Momeka is “an internationally respected and leading representative of the Nineveh Christians who have been killed and deported by ISIS.”

Yet this nun is being “barred from coming to Washington to testify about this catastrophe?”
Sister Diana was the only Christian in the delegation and the only member blocked from the trip, the Washington Times reported, leading some of her American supporters to question why she was singled out.
Shea, in her op-ed titled “With Malice Toward Nun,” exposed the real reason why Obama denied the visa for Sister Diana.
“Sister Diana Momeka of the Dominican Sisters of Saint Catherine of Siena was informed on Tuesday by the U.S. consulate in Erbil that her non-immigrant-visa application has been rejected.
“The reason given in the denial letter, a copy of which I have obtained, is:

‘You were not able to demonstrate that your intended activities in the United States would be consistent with the classification of the visa.’”

Shea further explains:
“She told me in a phone conversation that, to her face, consular officer Christopher Patch told her she was denied because she is an ‘IDP’ or Internally Displaced Person. ‘That really hurt,’ she said. Essentially, the State Department was calling her a deceiver.”

Shea states that the State Department officials made the determination that the Catholic nun “could be falsely asserting that she intends to visit Washington when secretly she could be intending to stay. That would constitute illegal immigration, and that, of course, is strictly forbidden. Once here, she could also be at risk for claiming political asylum, and the U.S. seems determined to deny ISIS’s Christian victims that status.”

*To read the complete article, please go to: