We have all seen that the Clintons have a pretty self-serving view of the world. While claiming to promote income equality, Hillary sports one of her pantsuits that cost probably more than a middle income family’s salary for the month. She says one of her goals is income equality yet this law is already in force . . . signed into law by former President Bill Clinton. Don’t they every compare notes? And a current speech about how she is going to eliminate college fees and a multitude of other fairy tales, she pretty much had a very similar speech to one her husband gave twenty-five years ago. Did any of it come true from that campaign promise? No, so why should we believe the person who can’t tell if she was actually landing under enemy.
Her latest and ‘greatest’ mouthing off took a direct hit at personally held morals and values and, in essence, targeted Christians specifically, when she said:
“Far too many women are denied access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth, and laws don’t count for much if they’re not enforced. Rights have to exist in practice — not just on paper. Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”
So the separation of church and state doesn’t exist in her cerebral wonder land? A country founded on respect for faith and morals is to be changed to force everyone to support and honor man-made laws over God-given ones? Freedom of choice is a lost issue. God is always available so, perhaps, Miz Clinton should try getting in touch with Him before trying to separate us from Him.